Why SAP-enabled Supply Chains Choose Firefighting

Firefighting rarely begins as a strategy. It usually starts with unstable planning, poor data integrity, and SAP workarounds that slowly become embedded into daily operations, often with significant cost.

Most supply chain teams spend their days expediting, manually adjusting plans, chasing approvals, juggling spreadsheets, justifying stock outs, or buying stock “just in case”.

Eventually, this behaviour becomes normalised. The warehouse blames procurement. Procurement blames the MRP team. The MRP team blames the end users. End users blame MRP settings. Eventually, everyone blames SAP.

But the truth is, SAP is rarely the problem. Once trust in planning and execution begins to break down, reactive behaviour starts replacing operational discipline. Supply chains slowly begin optimising firefighting instead of execution, and waste and cost start piling up.

Using Lean thinking as a guide, this is how I see supply chain waste appearing in SAP-enabled operations, how firefighting is fueled, and where hidden costs lurk:Data 

 

Defects

In SAP-enabled environments, defects often include:

  • incorrect lead times,
  • poor master data,
  • inaccurate stock,
  • weak forecasting,
  • or unreliable transactional discipline.

MRP logic does not correct these defects, it amplifies them.

Talent

Highly skilled planners, MRP controllers and buyers often spend their day:

  • manually intervening,
  • updating spreadsheets,
  • or chasing information.

People become administrators of system instability instead of managers of operational execution.

Inventory

When trust in planning signals drops, inventory becomes a protection mechanism.

  • Buyers purchase early.
  • Planners inflate buffers.
  • Warehouses absorb uncertainty.

Excess inventory ties up working capital and hides poor planning.

Transportation

In many SAP-enabled environments, supply chains begin moving data more than material.  This movement takes the form of:

  • spreadsheets,
  • emails,
  • screenshots,
  • manual exports,
  • and duplicated information across departments.

Motion

This often appears as:

  • second guessing the system,
  • repeated approvals,
  • cross-functional chasing,
  • disconnected workflows,
  • and excessive transactional effort.

Operational activity increases, not because the process is efficient, but because people must compensate for poor automation and weak integration.

Premature Production

  • Buyers purchase ahead of need.
  • Teams create informal buffers.
  • Operational workarounds become standard practice.

The result is increased inventory cost and obsolescence risk.

Over-processing

This includes:

  • expediting,
  • re-planning,
  • manual overrides,
  • spreadsheet reconciliation and reporting,
  • justifying stock outs,
  • and constant escalation to resolve operational disruptions.

Teams spend more time managing reactive activities than managing execution. Firefighting is not the waste itself. It is what waste looks like in execution.

Waiting

Supply chains slow down when:

  • stock or information is late,
  • decisions are delayed,
  • stock visibility is poor,
  • or departments operate in silos.

Delays increase downtime risk, disrupt execution reliability, and reduce organisational responsiveness.

Waste Creates Cost. Firefighting Hides It.

SAP does not create operational waste on its own. Once reactive behaviour becomes operational culture, inefficiencies scale quickly across the organisation. And the costs of reactive behaviour are quietly absorbed into overtime, expediting, downtime, excess inventory, lost productivity, duplicated effort, and operational instability. Eventually, organisations stop seeing these costs as waste and start accepting them as “normal operations”.

Supply chains are trying to solve operational instability with dashboards, AI, and more technology. But reactive behaviour cannot be automated into stability. What is needed is cleaner data integrity, more stable planning signals, better departmental integration, reduced manual intervention, and greater trust in operational execution.

Until then, supply chains will continue optimising firefighting instead of execution.

© SweetThorn Thought Leadership
Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions